FCC requested to remove TikTok from the Apple store and Google store



Brendan Carr, the commissioner of the FCC (Federal Communications Commission), requested to remove TikTok from the Apple store and Google store. In a statement dated June 24, 2022, Carr told Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai.

“TikTok poses an unacceptable national security risk due to its extensive data harvesting being combined with Beijing’s apparently unchecked access to that sensitive data.”

Carr also said:



Excessive data collection


TikTok is said to gather everything, from search and data histories; keystrokes; biometric identifiers — including voice and face acknowledgment — area information; draft messages; metadata; and information put away on the clipboard, including message, pictures, and recordings.

Carr referred to a few occurrences as proof that TikTok has been dodgy about its information assortment rehearses.

Connection to Communist Party of China


ByteDance, an organization situated in Beijing, created TikTok. In China, it is known as Douyin. Carr referenced in his letter to Apple and Google that ByteDance "is under obligation to the Communist Party of China and expected by Chinese regulation to follow the PRC's reconnaissance requests."

The Senate and House panel individuals, online protection specialists, security, and social liberties bunches have hailed this as a worry. In 2019, two legislators named TikTok as a "potential counterintelligence danger we can't overlook". The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is additionally worried about the social stage's "ambiguous" approaches, particularly in gathering and utilizing biometric information.


Unclear use of collected data


Gathering information is a non-issue for applications that clarify they are doing this, yet these must likewise say how they utilize the information they gather. TikTok, it shows up, isn't one of those applications that don't maintain this proviso.
“Numerous provisions of the Apple App Store and Google Play Store policies are relevant to TikTok’s pattern of surreptitious data practices—a pattern that runs contrary to its repeated representations,” the letter reads.

“For instance, Section 5.1.2(i) of the Apple App Store Review Guidelines states that an app developer ‘must provide access to information about how and where the data [of an individual will be used’ and ‘[d]ata collected from apps may only be shared with third parties to improve the app or serve advertising.”


Is TikTok a “refined surveillance device”?

TikTok didn't neglect to move when news spread of the FCC requiring its expulsion from major application stores.

With CNN, Michael Beckerman, VP, Head of Public Policy, Americas at TikTok, invalidated a huge piece of the FCC's cases against the web-based entertainment organization, predicated on the thought that Carr is definitely not a specialist on such issues and that FCC doesn't have purview over public safety.

“He’s pointing out a number of areas that are simply false in terms of information that we’re collecting, and we’re happy to set the record straight,” Beckerman said.


At the point when gotten some information about the errors in Carr's cases, Beckerman answered: "He's referencing we're gathering program history, similar to we're following you across the web. That is just bogus. It is something that various online entertainment applications manage without actually looking at your program history across other applications. That isn't the very thing TikTok does."

“He’s talking about faceprints—that is not something we collect,” he said, explaining that the technology in their app is not for identifying individuals but for the purpose of filters, such as knowing when to put glasses or a hat on a face/head.

Concerning keystroke patterns,

“It’s not logging what you’re typing. It’s an anti-fraud measure that checks the rhythm of the way people are typing to ensure it’s not a bot or some other malicious activity.” Beckerman said,

When challenged if the CCP has seen any non-public user data, he said,

“We have never shared information with the Chinese government nor would we […] We have US-based security teams that manage access, manage the app, and, as actual national security agencies like the CIA during the Trump administration pointed out, the data that’s available on TikTok—because it’s an entertainment app—is not of a national security importance.”

Government officials and security advocates have scrutinized TikTok for possibly uncovering US client information to China for a really long time. To ease fears, TikTok collaborated with Oracle and started steering information of its American clients to US-based servers.

This, nonetheless, doesn't address a few inquiries raised when Buzzfeed News broke the tale about TikTok representatives in China "over and over" getting to US client information for basically a while. Such occurrences allegedly happened from September 2021 to January 2022, months before the Oracle information rerouting.

There is also an allegation that a member of TikTok’s trust and safety department said in a meeting that “Everything is seen in China”. A director in another meeting allegedly claimed that a colleague in China is a “Master Admin” who “has access to everything.”

“We want to be trusted,” Beckerman said during the CNN interview. 

“There’s obviously a lack of trust across the Internet right now, and for us, we’re aiming for the highest, trying to be one of the most trusted apps, and we’re answering questions and being as transparent as we can be.”